Did you know…
Why did Lufthansa leave the last row of its A320neos empty?
Short answer
To comply with a 31 July 2019 EASA airworthiness directive that temporarily limited the A320neo's center-of-gravity envelope. Lufthansa blocked the last row on its 20 A320neos: since 12 September, row 32 has no longer been assigned to passengers.

A center-of-gravity adjustment
Lufthansa stopped selling the last row of seats on its Airbus A320neo aircraft to address the plane's center-of-gravity (CG) limitations. The airline told its pilots in an internal memo that it was an ad hoc measure to comply with regulatory requirements. Behind it was an EASA airworthiness directive issued on 31 July 2019, which imposed temporary revisions to the A320neo flight manual to limit the center-of-gravity envelope.
What the analyses found
Analysis and laboratory testing of the A320neo's flight control law behavior identified reduced effectiveness of the angle-of-attack protection when the aircraft is in certain flight configurations combined with specific maneuvers commanded by the crew. That condition, which had never been encountered in operation, could lead, if not corrected, to an excessive nose-up attitude and a possible increase in crew workload.
Row 32, off the seat map
Lufthansa blocked the last row of seats on all 20 A320neos in its fleet. Starting on 12 September, row 32 stopped being assigned to passengers, even staff traveling on ID tickets. The airline stopped selling that rear row in response to the EASA directive.
More questions

Peter Haas (CC BY SA), vía commons Safety and accidents
What is the "pickle fork" that cracked on some Boeing 737 NGs?
It's the main structural member joining the fuselage and the wings. There are four per aircraft, one on each side of the forward and rear attachment frames… more…

Julian Herzog (Website) (CC BY), vía commons Safety and accidents
Did you know the A320 that crashed in Habsheim in 1988 had only been delivered to Air France three days earlier?
True: A320-111 F-GFKC, serial number 9, first flew on 6 January 1988 and was delivered to Air France on 23 June, three days before the accident. On 26 June… more…

Julian Herzog (Website) (CC BY), vía commons Safety and accidents
Did the engines on the Habsheim A320 respond badly when the pilot asked for full power?
No. Five seconds after TO/GA power was applied, engine No. 1 was at 83% N1 and No. 2 at 84%, and 0.6 seconds later both were at 91%. With the CFM56-5 it takes… more…

Julian Herzog (Website) (CC BY), vía commons Safety and accidents
How much time passed between the bird strike and Flight 1549's ditching in the Hudson?
Less than four minutes. The aircraft struck a flock of Canada geese at 3:27:11 p.m., at 2,818 feet (859 m); Sullenberger made the mayday call at 3:27:33 p.m… more…

Julian Herzog (Website) (CC BY), vía commons Safety and accidents
Why did the Hudson A320 carry life vests and rafts even though its route didn't require them?
Because that specific aircraft was certified for extended overwater operations, so it carried extra vests, rafts, and slide-rafts, even though FAA rules… more…

Julian Herzog (Website) (CC BY), vía commons Safety and accidents
Could Flight 1549's A320 have made it back to LaGuardia?
Only in the simulator: tests showed it could return to LaGuardia if it turned toward the airport right after the bird strike. Even so, only seven of thirteen… more…