Did you know…

Why are supersonic planes banned?

Short answer

Supersonic aircraft are not banned; what is prohibited is civil supersonic flight over land in the United States (since 1973) and many other countries, because sonic booms reach the ground along the whole route. Concorde therefore flew at Mach 2 only over the ocean. In 2025 the US ordered the FAA to replace the ban with a noise-based standard.

Why are supersonic planes banned?
Tupolev Tu-144Dmitry Terekhov from Odintsovo, Russian Federation (CC BY SA), vía commons

What the rules actually say

There has never been a ban on building or flying supersonic aircraft. Military jets exceed Mach 1 routinely, and Concorde carried passengers at Mach 2 for 27 years. What exists is a prohibition on civil aircraft flying faster than the speed of sound over land. In the United States it is written into Federal Aviation Regulation 91.817, adopted in 1973, which forbids civil flight at a true flight Mach number greater than 1 over US territory unless a special authorisation is granted. The United Kingdom, France and many other countries have similar national rules or apply case-by-case restrictions, and the International Civil Aviation Organization asks its members to ensure that sonic booms create no unacceptable situation for the public.

Why the boom is the problem

An aircraft flying supersonically drags a pair of shock waves along its whole route. On the ground they are heard as a double bang and felt as a pressure jump of roughly 100 pascals (2 lb/ft²) for a Concorde-sized aircraft, enough to rattle windows and, in rare cases, crack plaster or glass. Unlike airport noise, which is confined to the vicinity of a runway, the boom carpet is 40 to 80 km wide and follows the aircraft for the entire supersonic segment. In 1964 the US Air Force flew a six-month test over Oklahoma City, with more than 1,200 booms, and the volume of complaints and damage claims convinced regulators that routine overland supersonic flight was unacceptable. The rule was framed in the expectation that the American SST programme, cancelled in 1971, would eventually fly.

Consequences and the way out

The overland ban is the main reason Concorde only made money on the North Atlantic. Routes across the continental United States, or from Europe to Asia over Russia and India, would have had to be flown subsonic for most of their length, wiping out the time advantage. That in turn kept the fleet small and the aircraft expensive.

The current effort to reopen the question rests on changing the aircraft rather than the rule. NASA's X-59, built by Lockheed Martin under the Quesst programme, is shaped so that its shocks do not coalesce into a sharp bang but reach the ground as a soft thump. NASA intends to fly it over communities and collect public reaction data to hand to regulators. In June 2025 a US executive order instructed the FAA to repeal the blanket prohibition and replace it with a certification standard based on noise, so that an aircraft quiet enough at ground level could be allowed over land. Until such a standard is in force, any new supersonic airliner is confined to routes over water, as Concorde was.

More questions