Did you know…

Why is the a320 so popular?

Short answer

Because it made narrowbody flying cheap to operate and cheap to staff. The A320 family has taken more than 18,000 orders since 1984, on the strength of fly-by-wire with one cockpit and a single type rating across the range, a cabin wider than its direct rival's, and a neo re-engining Airbus credits with up to 20% lower fuel burn.

Why is the a320 so popular?
Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D AIQT 01Julian Herzog (Website) (CC BY), vía commons

Commonality as a business case

When the A320 entered service in 1988 it brought full fly-by-wire and a sidestick to civil transport, and Airbus then built the whole family, from the A318 to the A321 and their neo successors, around one cockpit. A pilot holds a single type rating for all of them, and moving on to the A330 or A350 takes only a short differences course. For an airline that means one pool of pilots, one simulator programme, one set of procedures and far fewer rostering constraints. Very little else on the aircraft generates as much value.

The cabin passengers notice

The fuselage is 3.95 m across, giving a cabin roughly 16 cm wider than its direct competitor's. That buys wider seats or a wider aisle, faster boarding, and containerised baggage in the hold, since an LD3-45 container fits where the rival narrowbody has to be loaded by hand. On short sectors flown six times a day, minutes saved on the ramp compound into aircraft utilisation, which is the number that actually decides low-cost economics.

Re-engining instead of replacing

The neo, in service since 2016, kept the airframe and changed the engines, offering the LEAP-1A or the geared PW1100G together with sharklets; Airbus credits the package with up to 20% lower fuel burn. Because the certification basis and the type rating survived, operators absorbed it without retraining crews or rebuilding maintenance programmes. The result is more than 18,000 orders since 1984 and a backlog stretching into the next decade. The A321neo has gone further still, opening thin transatlantic routes that previously needed a widebody and no longer close the business case at that size.

More questions